pico-WAM: Evaluating Counterfactual Prediction and Planning Error in a Compact World Action Model
Is a failing world action model limited by proposals or scoring? On Push-T, simulator costs in place of learned scores add 12.2 points of coverage; simulator states in proposals show no detected gain.世界动作模型失败时，问题出在动作提议还是轨迹评分？在 Push-T 上，把学习的评分换成仿真器代价可提升 12.2 个百分点的覆盖率，而在提议阶段换用仿真器状态未见增益。提供可复现的诊断流程。
BibTeX
@misc{pandya2026pico,
title = {{pico-WAM: Evaluating Counterfactual Prediction and Planning Error in a Compact World Action Model}},
author = {Keivalya Pandya},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2611.01039},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.RO},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01039},
}